giraffepoliceforce:

madderthanaboxoffrogs:

angelofthanatos:

dancinwithabottle:

nothingeverlost:

Every time I see this I think to myself “You defaced a book? Hell no I’m not marrying you.”

Yeah, I feel that way too. Glad I’m not the only one. Though I really like those flowers I’ve seen made from books. I’m torn over those…

He could have gotten a blank box for a couple of dollars, photocopied the first page of the chapter, pasted it to the inside of the box, made the box look just like the book; without defacing the book.

#PRINTED BOOKS ARE NOT SACRED   #THERE ARE MILLIONS OF THEM   #I HAVE A LOT OF FEELS   #ABOUT HOW PEOPLE WORSHIP THE PHYSICAL FORM OF BOOKS   #AND NOT THE WORDS INSIDE   #THE WORDS ARE THE IMPORTANT BIT   #AND USING A BOOK FOR SOMETHING SWEET LIKE THIS ISN’T DEFACEMENT OF PROPERTY IF THE PERSON OWNS THE BOOK. BOOKS ARE UBIQUITOUS   #AND HAVING WORKED IN A USED BOOKSTORE A LOT OF THEM GET TRASHED   #AND NOT JUST CRAPPY BOOKS   #GOOD ONES LIKE THIS ONE   #I WOULD RATHER SOMEONE USE THIS FOR SOMETHING MEMORABLE LIKE THIS THAN GET TRASHED   #DON’T JUDGE PEOPLE WHO TRY TO MAKE PRETTY THINGS WITH BOOKS   #BOOKS CAN BE REPLACED AND ARE NOT INHERENTLY SACRED  (via andrastesgrace)

Do you know what happens to books that don’t sell? They get pulped. Do you know what happens to books that libraries don’t want to carry anymore? They get pulped. Do you know what happens to vast majority of damaged books? THEY END UP IN A DUMPSTER.

Books are not immortal. And they are not singular in purpose.

If you’re destroying books because you’re intent on limiting the messages and information that can be given to the people then yes, you’re evil and need to be locked in a room somewhere.

But if you’re taking someone’s art and using it to create more art you are not defacing anything you’re bringing more art into the world and don’t you dare shame people that choose to do that.

221books:

cornflakepizza:

winchesterbr0s:

hesmybrother-hesadopted:

beesmygod:

“chuffed doesnt mean what you think it means”

image

it means exactly what i think it means its just some stupid word that literally has two definitions that mean the opposite thing

This makes me really chuffed.

This post is quite egregious

image

Well I’m nonplussed by this whole post.

image

image

I’m the person that reads your tags.

angelrin89:

image

bidyke:

barbidreamdumpster:

if you want to ask a bisexual or asexual person about their sexual history to verify that they’re queer, but you don’t want them to take it the wrong way, try this useful communication technique:

give them twenty dollars and go away.

As a bi person, I can attest to the beneficiality of this method.

Cuddling with Danny Zuko is a much better alternative to working. #doggy #dyalikedags #dannyzuko #offearly

daggerpen:

hamburgerjack:

This used to be the show. I’ll fight you over some Lois and Clark.

Lois and Clark had the best Lois and Clark. Kind of crappy villains, but these two were just perfect.